Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.
ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES INC (Form: 10-Q, Received: 02/10/2011 14:00:02)
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 1, 2011

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 0-12853

 

 

ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC.

 

 

 

Oregon   93-0370304

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

13900 N.W. Science Park Drive, Portland,

Oregon

  97229
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number: (503) 641-4141

Registrant’s web address: www.esi.com

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   ¨     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   ¨    Smaller Reporting Company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ¨     No   x

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock at February 4, 2011 was 28,188,707 shares.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

          PAGE NO.  
PART I.     FINANCIAL INFORMATION   
Item 1.      

Financial Statements

  
  

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) - at January 1, 2011 and April 3, 2010

     1   
  

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - for the fiscal quarter and three fiscal quarters ended January 1, 2011 and January 2, 2010

     2   
  

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - for the three fiscal quarters ended January 1, 2011 and January 2, 2010

     3   
  

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

     4   
Item 2.      

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     12   
Item 3.      

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     21   
Item 4.      

Controls and Procedures

     21   
PART II.     OTHER INFORMATION   
Item 1.      

Legal Proceedings

     21   
Item 1A.   

Risk Factors

     22   
Item 6.      

Exhibits

     30   
SIGNATURES         31   


Table of Contents

ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

 

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011      Apr 3, 2010  
ASSETS      

Current assets:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 47,061       $ 39,335   

Restricted cash

     10,769         10,824   

Short-term investments

     104,949         116,140   
                 

Total cash, restricted cash and investments

     162,779         166,299   

Trade receivables, net of allowances of $564 and $697

     44,630         38,061   

Inventories

     70,180         72,090   

Shipped systems pending acceptance

     4,744         4,106   

Deferred income taxes, net

     7,931         7,232   

Other current assets

     8,593         8,677   
                 

Total current assets

     298,857         296,465   

Non-current assets:

     

Non-current investments

     14,550         —     

Auction rate securities

     6,211         5,021   

Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $91,252 and $84,422

     38,840         40,590   

Non-current deferred income taxes, net

     34,062         31,079   

Goodwill

     4,014         —     

Acquired intangible assets, net

     10,446         8,255   

Other assets

     14,050         13,008   
                 

Total assets

   $ 421,030       $ 394,418   
                 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY      

Current liabilities:

     

Accounts payable

   $ 16,057       $ 14,607   

Accrued liabilities

     27,949         14,937   

Deferred revenue

     12,513         13,193   
                 

Total current liabilities

     56,519         42,737   

Non-current liabilities:

     

Income taxes payable

     9,706         9,019   

Commitments and contingencies

     

Shareholders’ equity:

     

Preferred stock, without par value; 1,000 shares authorized; no shares issued

     —           —     

Common stock, without par value; 100,000 shares authorized; 28,184 and 27,665 issued and outstanding

     150,433         142,369   

Retained earnings

     201,427         199,486   

Accumulated other comprehensive income related to auction rate securities

     2,491         1,301   

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), other

     454         (494
                 

Total shareholders’ equity

     354,805         342,662   
                 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

   $ 421,030       $ 394,418   
                 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

 

1


Table of Contents

ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

 

     Fiscal quarter ended     Three fiscal quarters ended  

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

   Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010     Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  

Net sales

   $ 67,209      $ 39,048      $ 185,234      $ 89,289   

Cost of sales

     37,182        24,231        107,733        59,085   
                                

Gross profit

     30,027        14,817        77,501        30,204   

Operating expenses:

        

Selling, service and administration

     15,172        11,910        43,063        35,236   

Research, development and engineering

     10,210        8,793        30,638        23,689   

Legal settlement costs

     1,311        —          1,311        —     

Restructuring costs

     827        —          827        —     

Merger termination proceeds, net

     —          —          —          (4,516
                                

Net operating expenses

     27,520        20,703        75,839        54,409   
                                

Operating income (loss)

     2,507        (5,886     1,662        (24,205

Non-operating (expense) income:

        

Interest and other (expense) income, net

     (39     369        206        1,068   
                                

Total non-operating (expense) income

     (39     369        206        1,068   

Income (loss) before income taxes

     2,468        (5,517     1,868        (23,137

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

     117        (3,104     (73     (9,074
                                

Net income (loss)

   $ 2,351      $ (2,413   $ 1,941      $ (14,063
                                

Net income (loss) per share – basic

   $ 0.08      $ (0.09   $ 0.07      $ (0.51
                                

Net income (loss) per share – diluted

   $ 0.08      $ (0.09   $ 0.07      $ (0.51
                                

Weighted average number of shares – basic

     28,132        27,517        27,978        27,394   
                                

Weighted average number of shares – diluted

     28,667        27,517        28,458        27,394   
                                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

 

2


Table of Contents

ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

     Three fiscal quarters ended  

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    

Net income (loss)

   $ 1,941      $ (14,063

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     7,686        7,445   

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

     1,487        1,619   

Share-based compensation expense

     7,283        6,106   

Recovery of doubtful accounts

     (150     (31

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

     105        10   

Deferred income taxes

     (3,963     (11,723

Changes in operating accounts:

    

Increase in trade receivables, net

     (5,875     (3,366

Decrease in inventories

     17        7,701   

(Increase) decrease in shipped systems pending acceptance

     (638     214   

Decrease (increase) in other current assets

     513        (2,285

Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

     13,605        11,132   

Decrease in deferred revenue

     (761     (3,924
                

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     21,250        (1,165

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    

Purchases of investments

     (299,983     (205,780

Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments

     296,626        110,183   

Cash paid to acquire the assets of PyroPhotonics Lasers, Inc.

     (8,075     —     

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

     (4,382     (1,881

Decrease (increase) in restricted cash

     55        (10,824

Decrease in other assets

     306        7,337   

Minority equity investment

     —          (193
                

Net cash used in investing activities

     (15,453     (101,158

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    

Stock plan activity, net

     781        872   

Share repurchases

     —          (555
                

Net cash provided by financing activities

     781        317   

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

     1,148        1,110   
                

NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     7,726        (100,896

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

     39,335        153,538   
                

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

   $ 47,061      $ 52,642   
                

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

    

Cash paid for income taxes

   $ (1,485   $ (1,948

Income tax refunds received

   $ 712      $ 757   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

 

3


Table of Contents

ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted in these interim statements. Accordingly, these condensed consolidated financial statements are to be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. These interim statements include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods presented. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the entire year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of commitments and contingencies at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Management believes that the estimates used are reasonable. Significant estimates made by management include: revenue recognition; inventory valuation; product warranty reserves; allowance for doubtful accounts; share-based compensation; income taxes including the valuation of deferred tax assets; fair value measurements; valuation of cost method equity investments; valuation of goodwill; and valuation of long-lived assets.

There have been no significant changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies from those presented in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for its fiscal year ended April 3, 2010.

Certain reclassifications have been made in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for prior periods to conform to the current presentation. All references to years or quarters relate to fiscal years or fiscal quarters unless otherwise noted.

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There have been no recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the quarter ended January 1, 2011 that are of significance to the Company.

3. Restricted Cash

As of January 1, 2011, the Company had restricted cash of $10.8 million, which collateralizes commercial letters of credit substituted for the cash bond previously held by the Kaohsiung District Court of Taiwan. See Note 17 “Legal Proceedings” for further discussion.

4. Fair Value Measurements

Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value

Fair value is defined under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC Topic 820) as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include the following:

 

   

Level 1 , defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

 

4


Table of Contents
   

Level 2 , defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

 

   

Level 3 , defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 1, 2011 and April 3, 2010 was as follows (in thousands):

 

January 1, 2011

   Level 1      Level 2     Level 3      Total  

Money market securities

   $ 5,267       $ —        $ —         $ 5,267   

Government agencies

     —           86,170        —           86,170   

Commercial paper

     —           51,949        —           51,949   

Forward purchase or (sale) contracts:

          

Japanese Yen

     —           (85     —           (85

Korean Won

     —           (53     —           (53

Euro

     —           (11     —           (11

British Pound

     —           (37     —           (37

Auction rate securities

     —           —          6,211         6,211   

Preferred stock

     —           —          —           —     

April 3, 2010

   Level 1      Level 2     Level 3      Total  

Money market securities

   $ 4,244       $ —        $ —         $ 4,244   

Government agencies

     —           73,130        —           73,130   

Commercial paper

     —           41,992        —           41,992   

U.S. treasuries

     —           17,089        —           17,089   

Forward purchase or (sale) contracts:

          

Japanese Yen

     —           165        —           165   

Taiwan Dollar

     —           (10     —           (10

Korean Won

     —           15        —           15   

Euro

     —           6        —           6   

British Pound

     —           5        —           5   

Auction rate securities

     —           —          5,021         5,021   

Preferred stock

     —           —          —           —     

For Level 1 assets, the Company utilized quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

For Level 2 assets, exclusive of forward contracts, the Company utilized quoted prices in active markets for similar assets. For forward contracts, spot prices at December 31, 2010 and April 2, 2010 were utilized to calculate fair values.

The Level 3 assets consisted of auction rate securities and preferred stock acquired through the conversion of certain auction rate securities (ARS). As none of the Company’s ARS have traded through the auction process and limited market transactions have been observed for these securities, estimated fair values were based primarily upon the income approach using a discounted cash flow model which took into account the following: (i) the underlying structure of each security; (ii) the present value of future principal and interest payments discounted at rates that reflect current market conditions; (iii) consideration of the probabilities of default, restructuring or redemption by the issuer (trigger events); (iv) estimates of the recovery rates in the event of default for each security; (v) the financial condition, results, ratings of and financial claims on the bond insurers and issuers; and (vi) the underlying trust assets of the securities.

As of January 1, 2011, the Company held ARS with a total estimated fair value of $6.2 million. These ARS consisted of $13.7 million par value auction rate securities and $4.0 million par value auction rate securities which were converted by the bond issuer to its preferred stock during the third quarter of 2009. The contractual maturities of these securities range up to calendar year 2050, and several securities and the preferred stock do not have stated maturities. These securities previously provided short-term liquidity through a Dutch auction process that reset the applicable interest rate at pre-determined calendar intervals, generally every 28 to 35 days. As a result of the liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and capital markets, the Company’s ARS began to experience failed auctions during fiscal 2008. Since that time, none of the Company’s ARS have traded through the auction process, limited market transactions for these securities have been observed, and the credit quality of the counterparties has deteriorated.

 

5


Table of Contents

As of January 1, 2011, the estimated fair value of the Company’s ARS of $6.2 million included $2.5 million of total net unrealized gains. These unrealized gains have been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company’s ARS are classified as non-current assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 1, 2011, consistent with the classification at April 3, 2010.

Subsequent to the third quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company sold a certain ARS with a par value of $3.0 million for approximately $0.7 million. The Company will record a gain of $0.7 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 as the security was previously held at zero value. The Company currently continues to receive all interest payments on its ARS when due, but has not received dividend payments on its preferred stock since the third quarter of 2010. The Company cannot predict if or when its remaining ARS will become liquid or dividend payments on its preferred stock will resume. See the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 3, 2010 for further information related to these investments.

The following table illustrates Level 3 activity from October 2, 2010 to January 1, 2011 (in thousands):

 

     Auction Rate
Securities
     Preferred
Stock
     Total  

Fair Value, October 2, 2010

   $ 5,215       $ —         $ 5,215   

Adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income:

        

Unrealized gains

     996         —           996   

Purchases, issuances and settlements

     —           —           —     

Transfers into (out of) Level 3

     —           —           —     
                          

Fair Value, January 1, 2011

   $ 6,211       $ —         $ 6,211   
                          

As of January 1, 2011, the Company had $6.0 million invested in Series D Preferred Stock and $2.2 million invested in Series E Preferred Stock of OmniGuide, Inc., representing an 11% interest. At each reporting period end, the Company determines whether events or circumstances have occurred that are likely to have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these investments. If there are no events or circumstances identified that would adversely affect the fair value of the investments, the fair values of the investments are not calculated as it is not practicable to do so. As of January 1, 2011 and April 3, 2010, management had not identified any events or circumstances that indicated the investments were impaired; therefore, as presented in Note 8 “Other Assets”, the full carrying value of $8.2 million was included in Other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 1, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively.

Investments

Certain information regarding the Company’s investments at January 1, 2011 and April 3, 2010 was as follows (in thousands):

 

              Unrealized        

January 1, 2011

   Cost      Gain      Loss     Fair Value  

Available-for-sale securities (current):

          

Government agencies

   $ 71,626       $ —         $ (6   $ 71,620   

Commercial paper

     51,948         1         —          51,949   
                                  
   $ 123,574       $ 1       $ (6   $ 123,569   
                                  

Available-for-sale securities (non-current):

          

Government agencies

   $ 14,552       $ —         $ (2   $ 14,550   

Auction rate securities

     13,700         2,491         (9,980     6,211   

Preferred stock

     4,000         —           (4,000     —     
                                  
   $ 32,252       $ 2,491       $ (13,982   $ 20,761   
                                  

 

6


Table of Contents
              Unrealized        

April 3, 2010

   Cost      Gain      Loss     Fair Value  

Available-for-sale securities (current):

          

Government agencies

   $ 73,141       $ —         $ (11   $ 73,130   

Commercial paper

     41,992         —           —          41,992   

U.S. treasuries

     17,088         1         —          17,089   
                                  
   $ 132,221       $ 1       $ (11   $ 132,211   
                                  

Available-for-sale securities (non-current):

          

Auction rate securities

   $ 13,700       $ 1,301       $ (9,980   $ 5,021   

Preferred stock

     4,000         —           (4,000     —     
                                  
   $ 17,700       $ 1,301       $ (13,980   $ 5,021   
                                  

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company had no sales of available-for-sale securities. During the third quarter of 2010, the Company had no sales of current available-for-sale securities but sold certain non-current ARS with a par value of $1.9 million pursuant to a tender agreement with the parent company of the securities’ original issuer. The Company received approximately $1.4 million on the sale of the ARS, which had an estimated fair value of $1.6 million as of September 26, 2009. As a result of the sale, the Company reclassified $0.3 million of the previously recorded unrealized net gain out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The unrealized net gain represented the cumulative total of the fair value adjustments related to these ARS prior to the transaction. For purposes of determining gross realized gains and losses and reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income, the cost of securities sold is based on specific identification. Net unrealized holding gains and losses on current available-for-sale securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income were insignificant as of January 1, 2011 and April 3, 2010.

Underlying maturities of investments at January 1, 2011 were $123.6 million within one year, $14.6 million between one and five years and $6.2 million beyond ten years.

5. Inventories

Inventories are principally valued at standard costs, which approximate the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Components of inventories were as follows:

 

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011      Apr 3, 2010  

Raw materials and purchased parts

   $ 47,393       $ 47,636   

Work-in-process

     12,912         10,731   

Finished goods

     9,875         13,723   
                 
   $ 70,180       $ 72,090   
                 

6. Other Current Assets

Other current assets consisted of the following:

 

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011      Apr 3, 2010  

Prepaid expenses

   $ 4,542       $ 4,286   

Income tax refund receivable

     2,376         3,017   

Value added tax receivable

     1,669         1,179   

Other

     6         195   
                 
   $ 8,593       $ 8,677   
                 

 

7


Table of Contents

7. Acquired Intangible Assets

Acquired intangible assets as of January 1, 2011 and April 3, 2010 consisted of the following:

 

(In thousands, except years)

   Weighted-
Average
Useful Life
(In years)
     Jan 1, 2011     Apr 3, 2010  

Developed technology

     7       $ 8,100      $ 8,100   

Patents

     12.7         3,388        2,978   

In-process research and development

     Indefinite         3,204        —     

Customer relationships

     6         2,700        2,700   

Customer backlog

     1         700        700   

Trade name and trademarks

     3         400        400   

Fair value of below-market lease (non-current portion)

     3.8         311        311   

Change of control agreements

     1         100        100   
                   
        18,903        15,289   

Less accumulated amortization

        (8,457     (7,034
                   

Total non-current acquired intangible assets

        10,446        8,255   
                   

Fair value of below-market lease (current portion)

        110        110   

Less accumulated amortization

        (64     —     
                   

Total acquired intangible assets

      $ 10,492      $ 8,365   
                   

Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets has been recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows:

 

     Fiscal quarter ended      Three fiscal quarters ended  

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011      Jan 2, 2010      Jan 1, 2011      Jan 2, 2010  

Cost of sales

   $ 289       $ 288       $ 867       $ 866   

Selling, service and administration

     135         190         463         609   

Research, development and engineering

     52         52         157         144   
                                   

Total

   $ 476       $ 530       $ 1,487       $ 1,619   
                                   

The estimated amortization expense for intangible assets for the current year, including amounts amortized year to date, and in future years is as follows (in thousands):

 

Year

   Amortization  

2011

   $ 1,962   

2012

     1,716   

2013

     1,557   

2014

     1,429   

2015

     589   

Thereafter

     1,522   
        
   $ 8,775   
        

 

8


Table of Contents

8. Other Assets

Other assets consisted of the following:

 

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011      Apr 3, 2010  

Minority equity investment

   $ 8,184       $ 8,184   

Consignment and demo equipment, net

     4,938         3,957   

Other

     928         867   
                 
   $ 14,050       $ 13,008   
                 

9. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:

 

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011      Apr 3, 2010  

Payroll-related liabilities

   $ 10,982       $ 5,727   

Product warranty accrual

     4,354         2,576   

Income taxes payable

     2,763         801   

Customer deposits

     1,871         1,020   

Pension benefit liabilities

     1,868         1,415   

Professional fees payable

     1,694         1,327   

Legal settlement costs payable

     1,192         —     

Purchase order commitments and receipts

     940         1,352   

Restructuring costs payable

     815         60   

Other

     1,470         659   
                 
   $ 27,949       $ 14,937   
                 

10. Product Warranty Accrual

The following is a reconciliation of the change in the aggregate accrual for product warranty:

 

     Fiscal quarter ended     Three fiscal quarters ended  

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010     Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  

Product warranty accrual, beginning

   $ 4,111      $ 1,120      $ 2,576      $ 2,057   

Warranty charges incurred, net

     (1,872     (546     (4,655     (3,207

Provision for warranty charges

     2,115        1,118        6,433        2,842   
                                

Product warranty accrual, ending

   $ 4,354      $ 1,692      $ 4,354      $ 1,692   
                                

Net warranty charges incurred include labor charges and costs of replacement parts for system repairs under warranty. These costs are recorded net of any estimated cost recoveries resulting from either successful repair of damaged parts or from warranties offered by the Company’s suppliers for defective components. The provision for warranty charges reflects the estimate of future anticipated net warranty costs to be incurred for all products under warranty at fiscal year end and is recorded to cost of sales.

11. Deferred Revenue

Generally, revenue is recognized upon fulfillment of acceptance criteria at the Company’s factory and title transfer which frequently occur at the time of delivery to a common carrier. Revenue is deferred whenever title transfer is pending and/or acceptance criteria have not yet been fulfilled. Deferred revenue occurrences include sales to Japanese customers, shipments of substantially new products and shipments with custom specifications and acceptance criteria. In sales involving multiple element arrangements, the fair value of any undelivered elements, including installation services, is deferred until the elements are delivered and acceptance criteria are met. Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is deferred and recognized ratably over the duration of the contracts.

 

9


Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of the changes in deferred revenue:

 

     Fiscal quarter ended     Three fiscal quarters ended  

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010     Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  

Deferred revenue, beginning

   $ 16,373      $ 12,490      $ 13,193      $ 11,251   

Revenue deferred

     8,187        4,275        27,691        16,992   

Revenue recognized

     (12,047     (9,438     (28,371     (20,916
                                

Deferred revenue, ending

   $ 12,513      $ 7,327      $ 12,513      $ 7,327   
                                

12. Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation expense was included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows:

 

     Fiscal quarter ended      Three fiscal quarters ended  

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011      Jan 2, 2010      Jan 1, 2011      Jan 2, 2010  

Cost of sales

   $ 252       $ 252       $ 828       $ 817   

Selling, service and administration

     1,414         1,030         5,276         4,268   

Research, development and engineering

     420         370         1,196         1,021   
                                   

Total share-based compensation expense

   $ 2,086       $ 1,652       $ 7,300       $ 6,106   
                                   

13. Earnings Per Share

Following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

 

     Fiscal quarter ended     Three fiscal quarters ended  

(In thousands, except per share data)

   Jan 1, 2011      Jan 2, 2010     Jan 1, 2011      Jan 2, 2010  

Net income (loss)

   $ 2,351       $ (2,413   $ 1,941       $ (14,063
                                  

Weighted average shares used for basic earnings per share

     28,132         27,517        27,978         27,394   

Incremental diluted shares

     535         —          480         —     
                                  

Weighted average shares used for diluted earnings per share

     28,667         27,517        28,458         27,394   
                                  

Net income (loss) per share:

          

Net income (loss) – basic

   $ 0.08       $ (0.09   $ 0.07       $ (0.51
                                  

Net income (loss) – diluted

   $ 0.08       $ (0.09   $ 0.07       $ (0.51
                                  

Awards of options, stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SOSARs), unvested restricted stock units (RSUs) and shares associated with the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) representing an additional 3.0 million and 4.6 million shares of stock for the quarters ended January 1, 2011 and January 2, 2010, respectively, were not included in the calculation of diluted net earnings per share because their effect would have been antidilutive. For the three quarters ended January 1, 2011 and January 2, 2010, awards of options, SOSARs, unvested RSUs and ESPP shares representing an additional 2.9 million and 4.5 million shares, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net earnings per share as their effect would have been antidilutive.

 

10


Table of Contents

14. Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, were as follows:

 

     Fiscal quarter ended     Three fiscal quarters ended  

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010     Jan 1, 2011      Jan 2, 2010  

Net income (loss)

   $ 2,351      $ (2,413   $ 1,941       $ (14,063

Net unrealized gain on auction rate securities

     996        95        1,190         2,643   

Foreign currency translation adjustment

     232        (26     939         1,114   

Net unrealized (loss) gain on current available-for-sale securities

     (18     (17     3         (16

Reclassification of unrealized gain on auction rate securities to earnings

     —          (317     —           (317

Unrealized loss on cash flow hedge

     —          (87     —           (87

Other comprehensive income

     2        1        6         3   
                                 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   $ 3,563      $ (2,764   $ 4,079       $ (10,723
                                 

15. Share Repurchase Program

On May 15, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program totaling $20.0 million to acquire shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock primarily to offset dilution from equity compensation programs. The repurchases are to be made at management’s discretion in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements and are subject to market conditions, share price and other factors. There is no fixed completion date for the repurchase program.

The Company did not repurchase any shares under this program during the three quarters ended January 1, 2011. As of January 1, 2011, a total of 372,825 shares have been repurchased for $5.3 million under this authorization at an average price of $14.16 per share, calculated inclusive of commissions and fees. Any cash used to settle repurchase transactions is reflected as a component of cash used in financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

16. Product and Geographic Information

Net sales by product type were as follows:

 

     Fiscal quarter ended      Three fiscal quarters ended  

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011      Jan 2, 2010      Jan 1, 2011      Jan 2, 2010  

Semiconductor Group (SG)

   $ 29,674       $ 9,906       $ 61,891       $ 22,880   

Components Group (CG)

     7,755         10,344         39,862         21,592   

Interconnect/Micromachining Group (IMG)

     29,780         18,798         83,481         44,817   
                                   
   $ 67,209       $ 39,048       $ 185,234       $ 89,289   
                                   

Net sales by geographic area, based on the location of the end user, were as follows:

 

     Fiscal quarter ended      Three fiscal quarters ended  

(In thousands)

   Jan 1, 2011      Jan 2, 2010      Jan 1, 2011      Jan 2, 2010  

Asia

   $ 60,094       $ 32,046       $ 164,978       $ 70,698   

Americas

     3,928         3,992         11,558         11,196   

Europe

     3,187         3,010         8,698         7,395   
                                   
   $ 67,209       $ 39,048       $ 185,234       $ 89,289   
                                   

 

11


Table of Contents

17. Legal Proceedings

Legal Settlement

In 2009, James Dooley, former Chief Executive Officer of the Company, initiated arbitration against the Company seeking severance in connection with his 2003 termination. On December 10, 2010, the assigned arbitrator ruled in favor of Mr. Dooley. On December 27, 2010, the Company filed a complaint seeking declaratory relief to vacate the arbitration award with the United States District Court, District of Oregon. At the time of this filing, this proceeding was ongoing and no hearing had been scheduled. Accordingly, we recognized approximately $1.3 million in settlement and legal costs in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and a corresponding liability was included in Accrued Liabilities as of January 1, 2011.

All Ring Patent Infringement Prosecution

The Company’s proceedings against All Ring Tech Co., Ltd. (All Ring) in Taiwan for alleged patent infringement are ongoing. As part of these proceedings, the Company was required to post security bonds with the Kaohsiung District Court of Taiwan (Court). In July 2009 and September of 2009, the Company established letters of credit as a substitution for the security bonds and received back a total of $9.1 million from the Court. The letters of credit are collateralized by a total of $10.8 million of restricted cash, which is included on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 1, 2011 as a current asset. See the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 3, 2010 and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ending July 3, 2010 and October 2, 2010 for further background related to these proceedings.

18. Restructuring and Cost Management Plans

As part of the Company’s globalization strategy, during the third quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company initiated a restructuring plan to reduce its worldwide cost structure through transition of certain procurement and manufacturing activities to Asia. As a result of the planned actions, the Company recognized $0.8 million of restructuring costs in the third quarter of 2011 and a corresponding liability was included in Accrued Liabilities as of January 1, 2011.

Item 2.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact, including without limitation, statements containing the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates” and similar words, constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. From time to time we may make other forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are subject to an inherent risk that actual results may materially differ as a result of many factors, including the risks described in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors.”

Overview of Business

Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (ESI) provide high-technology manufacturing equipment to the global semiconductor and micro-electronics markets, including advanced laser systems that are used to micro-engineer electronic device features in high-volume production environments. Our customers are primarily manufacturers of semiconductors, electronic interconnect devices, passive components, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), or other components used in a wide variety of end products in the computer, consumer electronics, communications and other industries. Our equipment enables these manufacturers to implement device features or achieve yield and productivity gains in their manufacturing processes that can be critical to their profitability. ESI was founded in 1944 and is headquartered in Portland, Oregon, with subsidiaries in the United States, Canada, Europe and Asia.

Our advanced laser micro-engineering systems allow semiconductor and micro-electronics manufacturers to physically alter select device features during high-volume production in order to heighten performance and boost production yields. Laser micro-engineering comprises a set of precise micron-level processes, including advanced micromachining, wafer scribing and dicing, semiconductor memory-link cutting, semiconductor device trimming, material ablation, via drilling and nano-level structuring to alter material characteristics. These processes require application-specific laser systems able to meet our customers’ exacting performance and productivity requirements. Our laser-based systems improve production yields or enable improved performance for semiconductor devices, high-density interconnect (HDI) circuits, flexible interconnect material, advanced semiconductor packaging, LEDs, flat panel liquid crystal displays (LCDs) and other components.

 

12


Table of Contents

Additionally, we produce high-capacity test and optical inspection equipment that is critical to the quality control process during the production of multi-layer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs). Our equipment ensures that each MLCC meets both the electrical and physical tolerances required to perform properly.

Summary of Sequential Quarterly Results

The financial results of the fiscal quarter ended January 1, 2011, which represents the third quarter of 2011, reflected strong demand in key markets for our products. Total orders were $77.9 million, compared to $70.2 million for the second quarter of 2011, which ended October 2, 2010. The sequential increase in orders was driven primarily by increased orders from our Interconnect/Micromachining Group (IMG) and Components Group (CG).

Orders for our Semiconductor Group (SG) products decreased approximately 70% in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the prior quarter as customers who had placed multi-unit orders in the first two quarters absorbed capacity.

Orders for our CG products increased approximately 50% compared to the orders in the prior quarter. The increase was primarily due to orders from our MLCC manufacturing customers as they expand capacity at new facilities. We continue to see high utilization of our test systems by most CG customers.

Orders for our IMG products increased approximately 75% compared to the prior quarter, driven by strong orders from flex circuit and micromachining customers as they continue to add capacity to support global demand for consumer electronics and mobile devices.

Net sales of $67.2 million for the third quarter of 2011 increased $7.7 million compared to the prior quarter. SG sales increased $16.5 million due to the fulfillment of backlog orders to memory repair customers as they ramp capacity. Sales for our IMG products decreased $3.3 million primarily due to seasonal declines in deliveries to our flex circuit customers. Sales of our micromachining systems declined modestly due to timing of demand, partially offset by an increase in our laser ablation tools as a result of demand for a new platform from our New Wave Research (NWR) division. CG sales decreased $5.5 million as customers absorb capacity expansion from prior quarter deliveries.

Gross margin was 44.7% on net sales of $67.2 million for the third quarter of 2011 compared to 43.7% on net sales of $59.6 million for the prior quarter. The increase in gross margin percentage was primarily due to the favorable impact of a higher proportion of SG sales.

Net operating expenses of $27.5 million in the third quarter of 2011 increased $2.3 million compared to the prior quarter. This increase was primarily due to $1.3 million of legal settlement costs and $0.8 million of restructuring costs included in the third quarter of 2011. Excluding these items, net operating expenses increased slightly with higher costs from a full quarter of activity from our Pyrophotonics operations, largely offset by lower share-based compensation expenses and acquisition-related costs.

Operating income was $2.5 million in the third quarter of 2011, an increase of $1.8 million compared to $0.7 million in the prior quarter. The improvement was primarily due to higher gross profit, partially offset by legal settlement costs and restructuring charges.

The effective tax rate was 4.7% for the third quarter of 2011, reflecting the benefits from timing of income between quarters and the catch-up benefit from the renewal of the research and development tax credit.

Net income for the third quarter of 2011 was $2.4 million compared to net loss of $0.6 million in the prior quarter, primarily due to improved gross profit on higher revenues offsetting the impact of higher net operating expenses.

 

13


Table of Contents

Quarter Ended January 1, 2011 Compared to Quarter Ended January 2, 2010

Results of Operations

The following table presents results of operations data as a percentage of net sales:

 

     Fiscal quarter ended  
     Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  

Net sales

     100.0     100.0

Cost of sales

     55.3        62.1   
                

Gross margin

     44.7        37.9   

Selling, service and administration

     22.5        30.4   

Research, development and engineering

     15.2        22.5   

Legal settlement costs

     2.0        —     

Restructuring costs

     1.2        —     
                

Operating income (loss)

     3.8        (15.0

Interest and other (expense) income, net

     (0.1     0.9   
                

Income (loss) before income taxes

     3.7        (14.1

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

     0.2        (7.9
                

Net income (loss)

     3.5     (6.2 )% 
                

Net Sales

Net sales were $67.2 million for the third quarter of 2011, an increase of $28.2 million or 72.1% compared to net sales of $39.0 million for the third quarter of 2010. The increase was primarily driven by high shipment levels of our SG products as well as strong demand for our IMG products.

The following table presents net sales information by product group:

 

     Fiscal quarter ended  
       Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  

(In thousands, except percentages)

   Net Sales      % of Net Sales     Net Sales      % of Net Sales  

Semiconductor Group (SG)

   $ 29,674         44.2   $ 9,906         25.4

Components Group (CG)

     7,755         11.5        10,344         26.5   

Interconnect/Micromachining Group (IMG)

     29,780         44.3        18,798         48.1   
                                  
   $ 67,209         100.0   $ 39,048         100.0
                                  

SG sales in the quarter ended January 1, 2011 increased $19.8 million or 200% compared to the quarter ended January 2, 2010. The overall increase in sales was due to a rebound in memory repair markets with multi-unit purchases from two of the three largest DRAM manufacturers.

CG sales in the quarter ended January 1, 2011 decreased $2.6 million or 25% compared to the quarter ended January 2, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to normalization of demand from MLCC customers as compared to the prior year. Sales were higher than usual during the quarter ended January 2, 2010 as a result of demand that had built up during the preceding economic downturn.

IMG sales in the quarter ended January 1, 2011 increased $11.0 million or 58% compared to the quarter ended January 2, 2010. The increase was primarily driven by solid increases from our flex circuit, micromachining and laser ablation product lines. Demand from our flex circuit and micromachining customers continued to grow as they expand capacities to meet their supply requirements for smart phones and other mobile electronic devices. The increase of sales of our laser ablation products was driven by demand for the improved features of our new NWR platform.

 

14


Table of Contents

The following table presents net sales information by geographic region:

 

     Fiscal quarter ended  
     Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  

(In thousands, except percentages)

   Net Sales      % of Net Sales     Net Sales      % of Net Sales  

Asia

   $ 60,094         89.5   $ 32,046         82.1

Americas

     3,928         5.8        3,992         10.2   

Europe

     3,187         4.7        3,010         7.7   
                                  
   $ 67,209         100.0   $ 39,048         100.0
                                  

Compared to the quarter ended January 2, 2010, net sales for the quarter ended January 1, 2011 increased $28.0 million or 88% in Asia and $0.2 million or 6% in Europe and decreased $0.1 million or 2% in the Americas. The majority of our systems are sold into Asia as our customers’ manufacturing facilities are primarily located in that region.

Gross Profit

 

     Fiscal quarter ended  
     Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  

(In thousands, except percentages)

   Gross Profit      % of Net Sales     Gross Profit      % of Net Sales  

Gross Profit

   $ 30,027         44.7   $ 14,817         37.9
                                  

Gross profit for the quarter ended January 1, 2011 of $30.0 million increased $15.2 million compared to the quarter ended January 2, 2010, primarily due to higher revenue levels. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased to 44.7% for the quarter ended January 1, 2011 from 37.9% for the quarter ended January 2, 2010. This increase was primarily related to favorable product mix of SG sales, higher revenue levels and increased production capacity utilization.

Operating Expenses

 

     Fiscal quarter ended  
       Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  
(In thousands, except percentages)    Expense      % of Net Sales     Expense      % of Net Sales  

Selling, service and administration

   $ 15,172         22.5   $ 11,910         30.4

Research, development and engineering

     10,210         15.2        8,793         22.5   

Legal settlement costs

     1,311         2.0        —           —     

Restructuring costs

     827         1.2        —           —     
                                  
   $ 27,520         40.9   $ 20,703         52.9
                                  

Selling, Service and Administration

Selling, service and administration (SS&A) expenses primarily consist of labor and other employee-related expenses including share-based compensation expense, travel expenses, professional fees, sales commissions and facilities costs. SS&A expenses were $15.2 million for the quarter ended January 1, 2011, an increase of $3.3 million compared to the quarter ended January 2, 2010. This increase was primarily attributable to overall increases in business activity and improved operating results, resulting in increased headcount and higher compensation costs. In addition, various temporary cost reduction measures were in place in fiscal year 2010, including salary reductions, which have since been restored.

Research, Development and Engineering

Research, development and engineering (RD&E) expenses are primarily comprised of labor and other employee-related expenses, professional fees, project materials, equipment costs and facilities costs. RD&E expenses totaled $10.2 million for the quarter ended January 1, 2011, an increase of $1.4 million compared to the quarter ended January 2, 2010. This increase was primarily due to increased headcount and compensation expense, including the restoration of normal pay levels.

 

15


Table of Contents

Legal Settlement Costs

In 2009, James Dooley, former Chief Executive Officer of the Company, initiated arbitration against us seeking severance in connection with his 2003 termination for cause. On December 10, 2010, the assigned arbitrator ruled in favor of Mr. Dooley and, as a result, we recognized approximately $1.3 million in settlement and legal costs during the quarter ended January 1, 2011. On December 27, 2010, we filed a complaint seeking declaratory relief to vacate the arbitration award with the United States District Court, District of Oregon. At the time of this filing, this proceeding was ongoing and no hearing had been scheduled.

Restructuring Costs

As part of the Company’s globalization strategy, during the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we initiated a restructuring plan to reduce our worldwide cost structure through transition of certain procurement and manufacturing activities to Asia. As a result of these planned actions, we recognized $0.8 million of restructuring costs during the quarter ended January 1, 2011.

Non-operating Income and Expense

Interest and Other (Expense) Income, net

Interest and other (expense) income, net, consists primarily of interest income, market gains and losses on assets held for our deferred compensation plan, realized and unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses, bank charges, investment management fees, ARS valuation fees and other miscellaneous non-operating items. Net interest and other expense was insignificant during the quarter ended January 1, 2011 compared to net interest and other income of $0.4 million for the quarter ended January 2, 2010. The reduction was primarily due to unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations experienced in China and Korea and lower interest yields on our investments.

Income Taxes

 

     Fiscal quarter ended  
(In thousands, except percentages)    Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  
     Income Tax
Provision
     Effective
Tax Rate
    Income
Tax Benefit
    Effective
Tax Rate
 

Income tax provision (benefit)

   $ 117         4.7   $ (3,104     56.3
                                 

The income tax provision for the quarter ended January 1, 2011 was $0.1 million on pretax income of $2.5 million, an effective tax rate of 4.7%. For the quarter ended January 2, 2010, the income tax benefit was $3.1 million on pretax loss of $5.5 million, an effective tax benefit rate of 56.3%. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the timing of income between quarters, the expected level of annual income and the catch-up benefit resulting from the renewal of the research and development tax credit.

Our effective tax rate is subject to fluctuation based upon the mix of income and relative tax rates between jurisdictions, and the occurrence and timing of numerous discrete events such as changes in tax laws or their interpretations, extensions or expirations of research and experimentation credits, closure of tax years subject to examination, finalization of income tax returns, the relationship of fixed deductions to overall changes in estimated and actual pretax income or loss and the tax jurisdictions where income or loss is generated. Additionally, our effective tax rate varies widely as income before taxes fluctuates around breakeven points. Based on currently available information, we are not aware of any further discrete events which are likely to occur that would have a material effect on our financial position, expected cash flows or results of operations. We anticipate no significant changes in unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months as the result of examinations or lapsed statutes of limitation.

 

16


Table of Contents

Net Income (Loss)

 

     Fiscal quarter ended  
(In thousands, except percentages)    Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  
     Net income      % of Net Sales     Net Loss     % of Net Sales  

Net income (loss)

   $ 2,351         3.5   $ (2,413     (6.2 )% 
                                 

Net income for the quarter ended January 1, 2011 was $2.4 million, or $0.08 per basic share, compared to a net loss of $2.4 million, or $0.09 per basic share for the quarter ended January 2, 2010. The improvement was primarily due to improved gross profit on higher revenues in the third quarter of 2011 offsetting the impact of higher net operating expenses.

Three Quarters Ended January 1, 2011 Compared to Three Quarters Ended January 2, 2010

Results of Operations

The following table presents results of operations data as a percentage of net sales:

 

     Three fiscal quarters ended  
       Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  

Net sales

     100.0     100.0

Cost of sales

     58.2        66.2   
                

Gross margin

     41.8        33.8   

Selling, service and administration

     23.3        39.5   

Research, development and engineering

     16.5        26.5   

Legal settlement costs

     0.7        —     

Restructuring costs

     0.4        —     

Merger termination proceeds, net

     —          (5.1
                

Operating income (loss)

     0.9        (27.1

Interest and other income, net

     0.1        1.2   
                

Income (loss) before income taxes

     1.0        (25.9

Benefit from income taxes

     —          (10.2
                

Net income (loss)

     1.0     (15.7 )% 
                

Net Sales

Net sales were $185.2 million for the first three quarters of 2011, an increase of $95.9 million or 107% compared to net sales of $89.3 million for the first three quarters of 2010. Revenue increased in each of our product groups, reflecting improved capacity utilization as customers continued to recover from the global economic downturn and improved demand for consumer electronics.

The following table presents net sales information by product group:

 

     Three fiscal quarters ended  
     Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  
(In thousands, except percentages)    Net Sales      % of Net Sales     Net Sales      % of Net Sales  

Semiconductor Group (SG)

   $ 61,891         33.4   $ 22,880         25.6

Components Group (CG)

     39,862         21.5        21,592         24.2   

Interconnect/Micromachining Group (IMG)

     83,481         45.1        44,817         50.2   
                                  
   $ 185,234         100.0   $ 89,289         100.0
                                  

SG sales in the three quarters ended January 1, 2011 increased $39.0 million or 170% compared to the three quarters ended January 2, 2010. The overall increase in sales was due to improvement in memory markets as customers began to add capacity of memory repair tools in response to higher demand for DRAM memory. In addition, we have seen growth among LED-scribing and flat panel repair customers as the LED and LCD markets grow.

 

17


Table of Contents

CG sales in the three quarters ended January 1, 2011 increased $18.3 million or 85% compared to the three quarters ended January 2, 2010. The increase was primarily due to customer capacity expansion and increased tooling sales as a result of increased utilization levels of our MLCC customers’ existing systems, in turn driven by increasing demand for consumer electronics.

IMG sales in the three quarters ended January 1, 2011 increased $38.7 million or 86% compared to the three quarters ended January 2, 2010. The increase was primarily driven by strong orders from flex-circuit and micromachining customers, a result of increased consumer demand for portable consumer electronics.

The following table presents net sales information by geographic region:

 

     Three fiscal quarters ended  
     Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  
(In thousands, except percentages)    Net Sales      % of Net Sales     Net Sales      % of Net Sales  

Asia

   $ 164,978         89.1   $ 70,698         79.2

Americas

     11,558         6.2        11,196         12.5   

Europe

     8,698         4.7        7,395         8.3   
                                  
   $ 185,234         100.0   $ 89,289         100.0
                                  

Compared to the three quarters ended January 2, 2010, net sales for the three quarters ended January 1, 2011 increased across all geographic regions, but primarily in Asia where net sales increased 133%. The majority of our systems are sold into customers’ manufacturing facilities in that region.

Gross Profit

 

     Three fiscal quarters ended  
     Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  
(In thousands, except percentages)    Gross Profit      % of Net Sales     Gross Profit      % of Net Sales  

Gross Profit

   $ 77,501         41.8   $ 30,204         33.8
                                  

Gross profit for the three quarters ended January 1, 2011 was $77.5 million, an increase of $47.3 million compared to gross profit of $30.2 million for the three quarters ended January 2, 2010. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased to 41.8% for the three quarters ended January 1, 2011 from 33.8% for the three quarters ended January 2, 2010. These increases were primarily related to higher revenue levels, increased production capacity utilization and favorable product mix.

Operating Expenses

 

     Three fiscal quarters ended  
     Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  
(In thousands, except percentages)    Expense      % of Net Sales     Expense     % of Net Sales  

Selling, service and administration

   $ 43,063         23.3   $ 35,236        39.5

Research, development and engineering

     30,638         16.5        23,689        26.5   

Legal settlement costs

     1,311         0.7        —          —     

Restructuring costs

     827         0.4        —          —     

Merger termination proceeds, net

     —           —          (4,516     (5.1
                                 
   $ 75,839         40.9   $ 54,409        60.9
                                 

Selling, Service and Administration

SS&A expenses were $43.1 million for the three quarters ended January 1, 2011, an increase of $7.8 million compared to the three quarters ended January 2, 2010. This increase was primarily attributable to overall increases in business activity which resulted in increased headcount and higher compensation costs, including an increase in share-based compensation expense of $1.0 million. In addition, various temporary cost reduction measures were in place in fiscal year 2010, including salary reductions, which have since been restored. These increases in costs were partially offset by acquisition settlement proceeds of $0.9 million received in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.

 

18


Table of Contents

Research, Development and Engineering

RD&E expenses totaled $30.6 million for the three quarters ended January 1, 2011, an increase of $6.9 million compared to the three quarters ended January 2, 2010. This increase was primarily due to increased headcount and compensation expense, impacted by the restoration of normal pay levels, and increased project expenses.

Legal Settlement Costs

In 2009, James Dooley, former Chief Executive Officer of the Company, initiated arbitration against us seeking severance in connection with his 2003 termination for cause. On December 10, 2010, the assigned arbitrator ruled in favor of Mr. Dooley and, as a result, we recognized approximately $1.3 million in settlement and legal costs in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. On December 27, 2010, we filed a complaint seeking declaratory relief to vacate the arbitration award with the United States District Court, District of Oregon. At the time of this filing, this proceeding was ongoing and no hearing had been scheduled.

Restructuring Costs

As part of the Company’s globalization strategy, during the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we initiated a restructuring plan to reduce our worldwide cost structure through transition of certain procurement and manufacturing activities to Asia. As a result of these planned actions, we recognized $0.8 million of restructuring costs in the third quarter ended January 1, 2011.

Merger Termination Proceeds, net

Net merger termination proceeds of $4.5 million were recognized in the three quarters ended January 2, 2010, representing the receipt of a $5.4 million merger termination fee offset by $0.9 million of merger transaction costs.

Non-operating Income and Expense

Interest and Other Income, net

Net interest and other income was $0.2 million for the three quarters ended January 1, 2011 compared to $1.1 million for the three quarters ended January 2, 2010. The reduction was primarily due to unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations experienced in China and Korea and lower interest yields on our investments.

Income Taxes

 

     Three fiscal quarters ended  
(In thousands, except percentages)    Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  
     Income Tax
Benefit
    Effective
Tax Rate
    Income Tax
Benefit
    Effective
Tax Rate
 

Income tax benefit

   $ (73     (3.9 )%    $ (9,074     39.2
                                

The income tax benefit for the three quarters ended January 1, 2011 was $0.1 million on pretax income of $1.9 million, an effective tax rate of 3.9%. For the three quarters ended January 2, 2010, the income tax benefit was $9.1 million on pretax loss of $23.1 million, an effective tax rate of 39.2%. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the relative level of income or loss in each period, the increased tax advantages from growth in our Singapore manufacturing operations, and the recognition of the extended research and development tax credit benefit in the third quarter of fiscal 2011.

Our effective tax rate is subject to fluctuation based upon the mix of income and relative tax rates between jurisdictions, and the occurrence and timing of numerous discrete events such as changes in tax laws or their interpretations, extensions or expirations of research and experimentation credits, closure of tax years subject to examination, finalization of income tax returns, the relationship of fixed deductions to overall changes in estimated and actual pretax income or loss and the tax jurisdictions where income or loss is generated. Based on currently available information, we are not aware of any further discrete events which are likely to occur that would have a material effect on our financial position, expected cash flows or results of operations. We anticipate no significant changes in unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months as the result of examinations or lapsed statutes of limitation.

 

19


Table of Contents

Net Income (Loss)

 

     Three fiscal quarters ended  
(In thousands, except percentages)    Jan 1, 2011     Jan 2, 2010  
     Net Income      % of Net Sales     Net Loss     % of Net Sales  

Net income (loss)

   $ 1,941         1.0   $ (14,063     (15.7 )% 
                                 

Net income for the three quarters ended January 1, 2011 was $1.9 million, or $0.07 per basic share, compared to a net loss of $14.1 million, or $0.51 per basic share for the three quarters ended January 2, 2010. The improvement was primarily due to improved gross profit on higher revenues in the first three quarters of 2011, offsetting the impacts of higher net operating expenses and income taxes.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

At January 1, 2011, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents of $47.1 million, short-term investments of $104.9 million and accounts receivable of $44.6 million. We also held $10.8 million in restricted cash as collateral for commercial letters of credit. Our current ratio was 5.3 and we held no long-term debt. Working capital of $242.3 million was down from $253.7 million as of April 3, 2010, primarily as a result of a $14.6 million shift in investments from short-term to long-term.

In 2008, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program totaling $20.0 million to acquire shares of our outstanding common stock primarily to offset dilution from equity compensation programs. Repurchases under the program are to be made at management’s discretion in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements and are subject to market conditions, share price and other factors. We did not repurchase any shares under this program during the three quarters ended January 1, 2011. As of January 1, 2011, a total of 372,825 shares have been repurchased under this authorization for $5.3 million and an average price of $14.16 per share, calculated inclusive of commissions and fees. Cash used to settle repurchase transactions is reflected as a component of cash used in financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. There is no fixed completion date for the repurchase program.

As of January 1, 2011, we held a total of $13.7 million invested in auction rate securities (ARS) at par value. Additionally, we held $4.0 million of par value ARS which were converted by the bond issuer to its preferred stock during the third quarter of 2009. These securities were recorded at an estimated fair value of $6.2 million as of January 1, 2011. The contractual maturities of these securities range up to calendar year 2050, and several securities and the preferred stock do not have stated maturities.

We currently continue to receive all interest payments on our ARS when due, but have not received dividend payments on our preferred stock since the third quarter of 2010. Although we sold a certain ARS with a par value of $3.0 million for approximately $0.7 million subsequent to the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we cannot predict if or when our remaining ARS will become liquid or dividend payments on our preferred stock will resume.

Sources and Uses of Cash for the Three Quarters Ended January 1, 2011

Net cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $21.3 million for the three quarters ended January 1, 2011 due to $14.4 million from net income and non-cash items and $6.9 million from net changes within working capital. The primary sources of cash from working capital consisted of $13.6 million from increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and $0.5 million from decreases in other current assets, partially offset by increases in trade receivables of $5.9 million, decreases in deferred revenue of $0.8 million and increases in shipped systems pending acceptance of $0.6 million.

For the three quarters ended January 1, 2011, net cash used in investing activities of $15.5 million primarily resulted from the acquisition of the assets of PyroPhotonics Lasers, Inc. for $8.1 million, purchases of property, plant and equipment of $4.4 million and net purchases of investments of $3.4 million. Net cash provided by financing activities of $0.8 million was due to proceeds from stock plan activity.

 

20


Table of Contents

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are adequate to fund our operations, share repurchase program and contractual obligations for at least the next twelve months.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We reaffirm the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in Part II Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations reported in our Form 10-K for the year ended April 3, 2010.

Contractual Obligations

There have been no significant changes in our contractual obligations subsequent to those reported in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended on April 3, 2010.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes in the market risk disclosure contained in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 3, 2010. The information regarding liquidity of auction rate securities under the heading “Financial Condition and Liquidity” in Item 2 of Part I of this report is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Attached to this quarterly report as exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are the certifications of our President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our Chief Financial Officer (CFO) required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Section 302 Certifications). This portion of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q is our disclosure of the conclusions of our management regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on management’s evaluation of those disclosure controls and procedures. This disclosure should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a complete understanding of the topics presented.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended January 1, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.     Legal Proceedings

Legal Settlement

In 2009, James Dooley, our former Chief Executive Officer, initiated arbitration against us seeking severance in connection with his 2003 termination for cause. On December 10, 2010, the arbitrator ruled that, despite having pled guilty to violating federal securities laws by willfully and knowingly making false statements to the Company’s accountants, Dooley’s actions did not satisfy the definition of cause under his employment agreement. As a result, the arbitrator determined that Dooley is entitled to severance benefits under his employment agreement, plus interest from June 2005. This proceeding was subject to binding arbitration under the terms of the employment agreement. Accordingly, we recognized approximately $1.3 million in settlement and legal costs in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. On December 27, 2010, we filed a complaint seeking declaratory relief to vacate the arbitration award with the United States District Court, District of Oregon. At the time of this filing, this proceeding was ongoing and no hearing had been scheduled.

 

21


Table of Contents

All Ring Patent Infringement Prosecution

See our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 3, 2010 and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ending July 3, 2010 and October 2, 2010 for a description of our proceedings against All Ring Tech Co., Ltd.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact, including without limitation statements containing the words “believes,” “expects” and similar words, constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. From time to time, we may make other forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are subject to an inherent risk that actual results may differ materially. The following information highlights some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should be considered in light of these factors. Factors that may result in such variances include, but are not limited to, the following:

The industries we serve are volatile and unpredictable.

Our business is dependent upon the capital expenditures of manufacturers of semiconductors and micro-electronics used in wireless communications, computers and other electronic products. The capital equipment market for semiconductor and micro-electronics manufacturers has historically been characterized by sudden and severe cyclical variations in product supply and demand due to a number of factors including capacity utilization, demand for customers’ products, inventory levels relative to demand, and access to affordable capital. The timing, severity and duration of these market cycles are difficult or impossible to predict. Significant downturns in the market for semiconductor and micro-electronics used in electronic devices reduce demand for our products and may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

For example, the recent economic slowdown resulted in a decrease in orders for all of our product groups for each quarter throughout 2009, with virtually no orders for our memory repair systems throughout fiscal 2010. Additionally, some of our customers’ ability to access credit was adversely affected, limiting their ability to purchase our products. The degree of the impact on our business of the current economic environment will continue to depend on a number of factors, including the strength and continuity of the recovery in the US economy, the global economy in general, access to capital and stability of the financial system, and overall health of the semiconductor and micro-electronics industries. This impact may cause potential material adverse changes to our financial and operational results.

To meet rapidly changing demand in the industries we serve, we must effectively manage our resources and production capacity. During periods of decreasing demand for our products, we must be able to appropriately align our cost structure with prevailing market conditions and effectively manage our supply chain. Our ability to rapidly and effectively reduce our cost structure in response to such downturns is limited by the fixed nature of many of our expenses in the near term and by our need to continue our investment in next-generation product technology and to support and service our products. Conversely, when upturns in this market occur, we may have difficulty rapidly and effectively increasing our manufacturing capacity or procuring sufficient materials to meet sudden increases in customer demand, which could result in the loss of business to our competitors and harm to our relationships with our customers. If we are not able to timely and appropriately adapt to changes in our business environment, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive.

We face substantial competition from established competitors throughout the world, some of which have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do. Those competitors with greater resources may, in addition to other things, be able to better withstand periodic downturns, compete more effectively on the basis of price and technology, or more quickly develop enhancements to, and new generations of, products that compete with the products we manufacture and market. New companies may enter the markets in which we compete, or industry consolidation may occur, further increasing competition in those markets. Furthermore, our technological advantages may be reduced or lost as a result of technological advances by our competitors.

 

22


Table of Contents

Moreover, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected by competitive pressure and intense price-based competition. We have experienced and continue to experience significant price competition in the sale of our products. In addition, pricing pressures typically have become more intense during cyclical downturns when competitors seek to maintain or increase market share, reduce inventory or introduce more technologically advanced products. We believe that to be competitive we must continue to expend significant financial resources in order to, among other things, invest in new product development and enhancements. We may not be able to compete successfully in the future and increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins and loss of market share.

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly from period to period, which could negatively impact our business.

Our revenues, operating margins and other operating results could fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter depending upon a variety of factors, including:

 

   

demand for our products as a result of the cyclical nature of the semiconductor and micro-electronics manufacturing industries and the markets upon which they depend or otherwise;

 

   

changes in the timing and terms of product orders by our customers as a result of our customer concentration or otherwise;

 

   

changes in the mix of products and services that we offer;

 

   

timing and market acceptance of our new product introductions;

 

   

delays or problems in the planned introduction of new products, or in the performance of any such products following delivery to customers;

 

   

our competitors’ announcements of new products, services or technological innovations, which can, among other things, render our products less competitive due to the rapid technological change in our industry;

 

   

the timing and related costs of any acquisitions, divestitures or other strategic transactions;

 

   

our ability to reduce our costs in response to decreased demand for our products and services;

 

   

disruptions in our manufacturing process or in the supply of components to us;

 

   

write-offs for excess or obsolete inventory; and

 

   

competitive pricing pressures.

These risks may be exacerbated by the fact that we derive a substantial portion of our revenue from the sale of a relatively small numbers of products. As a result of these risks, we believe that quarter to quarter comparisons of our revenue and operating results may not be meaningful, and that these comparisons may not be an accurate indicator of our future performance.

Our markets are subject to rapid technological change, and to compete effectively, we must continually introduce new products that achieve market acceptance.

The markets for our products are characterized by rapid technological change and innovation, frequent new product introductions, changes in customer requirements and evolving industry standards. Our future performance will depend on the successful development, introduction and market acceptance of new and enhanced products that address technological changes and the requirements of current and potential customers. The development of new, technologically advanced products is a complex and uncertain process, requiring high levels of innovation and highly skilled engineering and development personnel, as well as the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify, develop, manufacture, market or support new or enhanced products successfully, if at all, or on a timely basis. The introduction by us or by our competitors of new or enhanced products, or alternative technologies, may cause our customers to defer, change or cancel orders for our existing products or cease purchasing our products altogether. For example, for many years the semi-conductor memory industry has employed alternative redundancy technologies. The adoption by our customers of electrical redundancy technology could have a material adverse effect on demand for our Semiconductor Group (SG) products. Further, we cannot assure that our new products will gain market acceptance or that we will be able to respond effectively to product announcements by competitors, technology changes or emerging industry standards. If we are unable to develop new or enhanced products to address product or technology changes or new industry standards on a timely basis or at all, or if our new or enhanced products are not accepted by the market, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

 

23


Table of Contents

We depend on a few significant customers, none of which are bound by long-term contracts, for a large portion of our revenues.

We depend on a few significant customers for a large portion of our revenues. In fiscal 2010, our top ten customers accounted for approximately 56% of total net sales, with one customer accounting for approximately 30% of total net sales. We anticipate that sales of our products to a relatively small number of customers will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenues. Consolidation between customers, changes in various partnership and technology arrangements between customers, customer bankruptcies or customer departures from their respective industries all may result in even fewer customers accounting for a high percentage of our revenue. For example, in early calendar 2009 Qimonda AG, historically one of our top European customers, went bankrupt.

None of our customers have any long-term obligation to continue to buy our products or services. As a result, our customers may delay, reduce or cease ordering our products or services at any time. Cancellations, reductions or deferrals could result from a number of factors, including a prolonged or additional downturn in the semiconductor or micro-electronics industries, manufacturing delays, completion of new product manufacturing ramp-up by customers, quality or reliability issues with our products, the development and introduction of new products and technologies by our competitors, or interruptions to our customers’ operations due to fire, natural disasters or other events. In particular, the markets we serve are subject to significant and unpredictable volatility, and downturns in those markets reduce demand for our products. In the future, the cancellation, reduction or deferral of purchases of our products by even a single customer could significantly reduce our revenues in any particular quarter. If we were to lose any of our significant customers or suffer a material reduction in their purchase orders, revenue could decline and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The failure of critical suppliers to deliver sufficient product quantities in a timely and cost-effective manner could negatively affect our business.

We use a wide range of materials from numerous suppliers in the manufacture of our products, including custom electronic, laser and mechanical components. We generally do not have guaranteed supply arrangements with our suppliers. We seek to reduce the risk of production and service interruptions and shortages of key parts by selecting and qualifying alternative suppliers for key parts, monitoring the financial stability of key suppliers and maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts. Although we make reasonable efforts to ensure that parts are available from multiple suppliers, some key parts are available only from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers in the short term. In addition, some of the lasers we use in our products are difficult to manufacture, and as a result we may not receive an adequate supply of lasers in a timely fashion to fill orders. Operations at our suppliers’ facilities are subject to disruption or discontinuation for a variety of reasons, including changes in business relationships, competitive factors, financial difficulties, work stoppages, fire, natural disasters or other causes. Any such disruption or discontinuation to our suppliers’ operations could interrupt or reduce our manufacturing activities and delay delivery of our products, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, as markets recover, there is a heightened risk that one or more of our suppliers may not be able to meet increased demand requirements, adversely impacting our ability to fulfill orders and win business with our customers.

The failure of our contract manufacturers to timely perform could negatively affect our business.

We have arrangements with contract manufacturers to complete the manufacture of certain of our products or product subcomponents. Any significant interruption in our contract manufacturers’ ability to provide manufacturing services to us as a result of contractual disputes with us or another party, labor disruptions, financial difficulties, natural disasters, delay or interruption in the receipt of inventory or other causes could result in reduced manufacturing capabilities or delayed deliveries for certain of our products, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

 

24


Table of Contents

We may recognize charges for excess or obsolete inventory if our demand projections are incorrect or our technology strategy changes.

Our business is highly competitive and one factor on which we compete is the ability to ship products on schedules required by customers. In order to facilitate timely shipping, management forecasts demand, both in type and amount of products, and these forecasts are used to determine inventory to be purchased. We also order materials based on our technology roadmap, which represents management’s assessment of technology that will be utilized in new products that we develop. Certain types of inventory, including lasers and optical equipment, are particularly expensive and may only be used in the production of a single type of product. If actual demand is lower than forecast with respect to the type or amount of products actually ordered, or both, our inventory levels may increase. For example, at January 1, 2011, we had $70.2 million of inventory reflected on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, much of which we purchased or committed to purchase prior to the time the severity of the recent economic downturn became apparent. As a result, there is a risk that we may have to incur material accounting charges for excess and obsolete inventory if inventory cannot be used, which would negatively affect our financial results. Also, if we alter our technology or product development strategy, we may have inventory which may not be usable under the new strategy, which may also result in material accounting charges. For example, during fiscal 2009, we wrote-off $4.1 million of material from a research, development and engineering program due to a change in our product development strategy.

We may not be able to protect the proprietary rights upon which our business depends.

Our success depends significantly upon the protection of our proprietary rights. We attempt to protect our proprietary rights through patents, copyrights, trademarks, maintenance of trade secrets and other measures, including entering into confidentiality agreements. We incur substantial costs to obtain and maintain patents and to defend our intellectual property rights. For example, we initiated litigation against All Ring Tech Co., Ltd. in Taiwan in August 2005 alleging that certain of our patent rights had been violated. We rely upon the laws of the United States and foreign countries where we develop, manufacture or sell our products to protect our proprietary rights. We may not be successful in protecting these proprietary rights, these rights may not provide the competitive advantages that we expect, or other parties may challenge, invalidate or circumvent these rights.

Further, our efforts to protect our intellectual property may be less effective in some foreign countries where intellectual property rights are not as well protected as in the United States. Many United States companies have encountered substantial problems in protecting their proprietary rights against infringement in foreign countries. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property in these countries, it could be easier for our competitors to sell competing products in foreign countries, which could result in reduced sales and gross margins.

We may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement.

Several of our competitors hold patents covering a variety of technologies, applications and methods of use similar to some of those used in our products. While we attempt in our designs to avoid patent infringement, from time to time we and our customers have received correspondence from our competitors claiming that some of our products, as used by our customers, may be infringing one or more of these patents. Competitors or others have in the past and may in the future assert infringement claims against our customers or us with respect to current or future products or uses, and these assertions may result in costly litigation or require us to obtain a license to use intellectual property rights of others. If claims of infringement are asserted against our customers, those customers may seek indemnification from us for damages or expenses they incur.

If we become subject to infringement claims, we will evaluate our position and consider the available alternatives, which may include seeking licenses to use the technology in question or defending our position. These licenses, however, may not be available on satisfactory terms or at all. If we are not able to negotiate the necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms or successfully defend our position, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our ability to reduce costs is limited by our need to invest in research and development.

Our industry is characterized by the need for continued investment in research and development. Because of intense competition in the industries in which we compete, if we were to fail to invest sufficiently in research and development, our products could become less attractive to our current and potential customers or obsolete, and our business and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. As a result of our need to maintain our spending levels in this area, our operating results could be materially harmed if our net sales decline.

 

25


Table of Contents

In addition, as a result of our emphasis on research and development and technological innovation, our operating costs may increase in the future, and research and development expenses may increase as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of net sales.

We have made acquisitions and may make additional acquisitions in the future, which may be difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute shareholder value or divert management attention.

We may make acquisitions of, or significant investments in, other businesses with complementary products, services or technologies, such as our September 2010 acquisition of the assets of PyroPhotonics Lasers, Inc. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, many of which are unpredictable and beyond our control, including:

 

   

difficulties and increased costs in connection with integration of the personnel, operations, technologies and products of the merged businesses;

 

   

implementation of our enterprise resource planning (ERP) system into the acquired company’s operations;

 

   

diversion of management’s attention from other operational matters;

 

   

the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company;

 

   

lack of synergy or inability to realize expected synergies resulting from the acquisition;

 

   

acquired assets becoming impaired as a result of technological advancements or worse-than-expected performance by the acquired company;

 

   

difficulties establishing satisfactory internal controls at the acquired company;

 

   

risks and uncertainties relating to the performance of the combined company following the transaction; and

 

   

incurring unanticipated liabilities for which we will not be indemnified.

Furthermore, the accounting for an acquisition could result in significant charges resulting from amortization of intangible assets we acquire. Our inability to effectively manage these risks could result in our inability to realize the anticipated benefits of an acquisition on a timely basis, or at all, and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, all acquisition transaction costs must be expensed as incurred rather than capitalized, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

The means by which we finance an acquisition may also significantly affect our business or the value of the shares of our common stock. If we issue common stock to pay for an acquisition, the ownership percentage of our existing shareholders will be reduced and the value of the shares held by our existing shareholders could be diluted. If we use cash on hand to pay for an acquisition, the payment could significantly reduce the cash that would be available to fund our operations or to use for other purposes. If we borrow funds in connection with an acquisition, we would be required to use cash to service the debt and to comply with financial and other covenants.

We may from time to time also make strategic investments in development stage companies. Investments in development stage companies are subject to a high degree of risk. We cannot assure you that we will not lose all or a portion of our investment in any such company.

We are implementing our globalization strategy, and if we do not effectively implement a globalization plan or if we decide to change our strategy, our operating results could be negatively impacted.

We are implementing our globalization strategy in which we are moving certain operational resources and capabilities to different countries in Asia to reduce costs and to be closer to our customers. We believe this strategy will reduce our manufacturing costs for certain products, enhance customer relationships and improve our responsiveness. We opened a manufacturing facility in Singapore in the fourth quarter of 2010 for certain IMG and CG products.

Our globalization strategy is subject to a variety of complexities and risks, many of which we have little experience managing, and which may divert a substantial amount of management’s time. These risks include:

 

   

challenges in designing new facilities that can be scaled for future expansion, replicating current processes and bringing new facilities up to full operation;

 

   

unpredictable costs, redundancy costs and cost overruns for developing new facilities and acquiring equipment;

 

26


Table of Contents
   

building local management teams, technical personnel and other staff for functions that we have not previously conducted outside of the United States;

 

   

technical obstacles such as poor production or process yield and loss of quality control during the ramp of a new facility;

 

   

requalifications and other procedures that may be required by our customers;

 

   

our ability to bring up local suppliers to meet our quality and cycle-time needs;

 

   

rapidly changing business conditions that may require plans to be changed or abandoned before they are fully implemented; and

 

   

challenges posed by distance and by differences in language and culture.

These and other factors could delay the development and implementation of our strategy, as well as impair our gross margins, delay shipments and deliveries, cause us to lose sales, require us to write off investments already made, damage our reputation and harm our business, financial condition and operating results. If we decide to change our current global regionalization strategy, we may incur charges for certain costs incurred.

We are exposed to the risks of operating a global business, including risks associated with exchange rate fluctuations, legal and regulatory changes and the impact of regional and global economic disruptions.

International shipments accounted for 90% of net sales in 2010, with 83% of our net sales to customers in Asia. We expect that international shipments will continue to represent a significant percentage of net sales in the future. We also have significant foreign operations, including a Singapore manufacturing facility, research and development facilities in Taiwan and China, and sales and service offices in various countries. Under our globalization strategy, we intend to increase our foreign operations in the future. Our non-U.S. sales, purchases and operations are subject to risks inherent in conducting business abroad, many of which are outside our control, including the following:

 

   

periodic local or geographic economic downturns and unstable political conditions;

 

   

price and currency exchange controls;

 

   

fluctuation in the relative values of currencies;

 

   

difficulty in repatriating money, whether as a result of tax laws or otherwise;

 

   

difficulties protecting intellectual property;

 

   

compliance with labor laws and other laws governing employees;

 

   

local labor disputes;

 

   

shipping delays and disruptions;

 

   

increases in shipping costs, caused by increased fuel costs or otherwise, which we may not be able to pass on to our customers;

 

   

unexpected changes in trading policies, regulatory requirements, tariffs and other barriers; and

 

   

difficulties in managing a global enterprise, including staffing, collecting accounts receivable, managing suppliers, distributors and representatives, and repatriating earnings.

Our business and operating results could also be impacted, directly or indirectly, by natural disasters, outbreaks of infectious disease, military action, international conflicts, terrorist activities, civil unrest and associated political instability. Any such events or circumstances may result in heightened security concerns with respect to domestic and international travel and commerce, which may further affect our business and operating results. In particular, due to these uncertainties, we are subject to the following additional risks:

 

   

future tightening of immigration controls may adversely affect the residence status of non-U.S. engineers and other key technical employees in our U.S. facilities or our ability to hire new non-U.S. employees in such facilities;

 

   

more frequent instances of shipping delays;

 

   

demand for our products may not increase or may decrease; and

 

   

our customers or suppliers may experience financial difficulties or cease operations.

Unfavorable currency exchange rate fluctuations may lead to lower operating margins or may cause us to raise prices.

Currency exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse effect on our sales and results of operations and we could experience losses with respect to forward exchange contracts into which we may enter. Unfavorable currency fluctuations could require us to increase prices to foreign customers, which could result in lower net sales by us to such customers. Alternatively, if we do not adjust the prices for our products in response to

 

27


Table of Contents

unfavorable currency fluctuations, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, many of our foreign sales are denominated in the currency of the country in which these products are sold and the currency we receive in payment for such sales could be less valuable at the time of receipt as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. From time to time, we enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge the value of accounts receivable primarily denominated in Japanese yen and other currencies. However, we cannot be certain that our efforts will be adequate to protect us against significant currency fluctuations or that such efforts will not expose us to additional exchange rate risks, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our effective tax rate is subject to fluctuation and we may have exposure to additional tax liabilities.

As a global company, we are subject to taxation in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate is subject to fluctuation from one period to the next because the income tax rates for each year are a function of many factors, including: (a) taxable income levels and the effects of a mix of profits (losses) earned by ESI and our subsidiaries in numerous tax jurisdictions with a broad range of income tax rates, (b) our ability to utilize deferred tax assets, (c) taxes, refunds, interest or penalties resulting from tax audits, (d) the magnitude of various credits and deductions as a percentage of total taxable income and (e) changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws. Changes in the mix of these items may cause our effective tax rate to fluctuate between periods, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Furthermore, we are periodically under audits by United States and foreign tax authorities. We may have exposure to additional tax liabilities as a result of these audits. Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income and other tax liabilities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final outcome of tax audits and the impact of changes in tax laws or the interpretation of tax laws could result in material differences from what is reflected in historical income tax accruals. If additional taxes are assessed as a result of an examination, a material effect on our financial results, tax positions or cash flows could occur in the period or periods in which the determination is made.

No significant market currently exists for the auction rate securities we hold and we may not be able to liquidate them at the current valuation, if at all, and we may recognize impairment charges if their estimated fair values decline.

As of January 1, 2011, we held a total of $13.7 million invested in auction rate securities (ARS) at par value. Additionally, we held $4.0 million of par value ARS which were converted by the bond issuer to its preferred stock during the third quarter of 2009. These securities were recorded at an estimated fair value of $6.2 million as of January 1, 2011. The contractual maturities of these securities range up to calendar year 2050, and several securities and the preferred stock do not have stated maturities. As a result of disruptions experienced in the global credit and capital markets, the auctions that previously provided liquidity for the ARS began to fail during the second fiscal quarter of 2008.

Since that time, none of these securities have traded through the auction process, and although we sold a certain ARS with a par value of $3.0 million for approximately $0.7 million subsequent to the third quarter of fiscal 2011, limited market transactions for these securities have been observed. Additionally, the bond insurers that guarantee the ARS experienced credit rating downgrades and the issuer of the preferred stock suspended dividend payments. Consequently, we recognized significant write downs of the ARS as a result of the declines in fair value and the ARS are categorized as non-current assets.

We cannot reasonably predict if or when our remaining ARS will become liquid, and it is not possible to ascertain when or whether market conditions will change resulting in the recovery of fair value on these auction rate securities. It is possible that a secondary market for the underlying securities will develop in which trading prices fall below our currently recorded fair values. Under such a scenario, or if other events arise that impact the fair value of the securities, we may have to recognize further losses, which would adversely impact our financial position and results of operations.

It is possible that changes in the credit markets could also impact the liquidity of our investments and cash equivalents, which could impair our liquidity or require us to recognize impairment charges on the value of those investments, which would negatively impact our financial position and results of operations.

 

28


Table of Contents

Our intangible assets may become impaired.

We held a total of $14.5 million in acquired intangible assets (See Note 7 “Acquired Intangible Assets”) and goodwill at January 1, 2011. We review our acquired intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We test goodwill for impairment at least annually. If such an adverse event occurred and had the effect of changing one of the critical assumptions or estimates related to the fair value of our intangible assets or goodwill, an impairment charge could result. For example, during fiscal 2009, as a result of a decrease in our market capitalization, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $17.4 million to write off all existing goodwill. Any such impairment charges may have a material negative impact on our financial condition and operating results.

We may be unable to retain, attract and assimilate key managerial, financial, engineering and other technical personnel.

Our continued success depends in part upon the services of our key managerial, financial and technical personnel. The loss of key personnel, or our inability to attract, assimilate and retain qualified personnel, could result in the loss of customers, inhibit our ability to operate and grow our business, and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We have previously had to, and may in the future have to, impose salary reductions on senior employees during economic downturns in an effort to maintain our financial position. These actions may have an adverse effect on employee loyalty and may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain key personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in the industries in which we compete is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining qualified personnel. We may incur significant costs in our efforts to recruit and retain key personnel, which could affect our financial position and results of operations.

We are exposed to lawsuits in connection with our business and operations.

From time to time we are subject to various legal proceedings, including claims that involve possible infringement of patent or other intellectual property rights of third parties. It is inherently difficult to assess the outcome of litigation matters, and there can be no assurance that we will prevail in any litigation. For example, in December 2010, an arbitrator ruled that James Dooley, our former Chief Executive Officer, is entitled to severance in connection with his 2003 termination for cause. Although we are contesting this decision, we recorded approximately $1.3 million in settlement and legal costs in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Any such litigation could result in substantial cost and diversion of management’s attention, which by itself could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results. Further, adverse determinations in such litigation could result in loss of our property rights, subject us to significant liabilities, require us to seek licenses from others or prevent us from manufacturing or selling our products, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Many of our products are highly complex and may contain defects or errors.

Our products are highly complex, and our extensive product development, manufacturing and testing processes may not be adequate to detect all defects, errors, failures and quality issues that could impact customer satisfaction or result in claims against us. As a result, we may have to replace certain components or provide remediation in response to the discovery of defects in products after they are shipped. The occurrence of any defects, errors, failures or quality issues could result in cancellation of orders, product returns, diversion of our resources, legal actions by our customers and other losses to us or to our customers. These occurrences could also result in the loss of, or delay in, market acceptance of our products and loss of sales, which would harm our business and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

Our stock price is volatile.

The market price of our common stock has fluctuated widely. During fiscal 2010, our stock price fluctuated between a high of $14.36 per share and a low of $5.92 per share. Consequently, the current market price of our common stock may not be indicative of future market prices, and we may be unable to sustain or increase the value of an investment in our common stock. Factors affecting our stock price, many of which our outside of our control, may include:

 

   

variations in operating results from quarter to quarter;

 

   

changes in earnings estimates by analysts or our failure to meet analysts’ expectations;

 

29


Table of Contents
   

changes in the market price per share of our public company customers;

 

   

market conditions in the semiconductor and other industries into which we sell products;

 

   

general economic conditions;

 

   

political changes, hostilities or natural disasters;

 

   

low trading volume of our common stock; and

 

   

the number of firms making a market in our common stock.

In addition, the stock market has recently experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations have particularly affected the market prices of the securities of high-technology companies like ours. These market fluctuations could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Provisions of our charter documents, our shareholder rights plan and Oregon law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.

Our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could make it harder for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors has also adopted a shareholder rights plan, or “poison pill,” which would significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer. In addition, the Oregon Control Share Act and the Oregon Business Combination Act limit the ability of parties who acquire a significant amount of voting stock to exercise control over us. These provisions may have the effect of lengthening the time required for a person to acquire control of us through a proxy contest or the election of a majority of our Board of Directors, may deter efforts to obtain control of us and may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without negotiation. These provisions may apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by our shareholders.

Item 6. Exhibits

This list is intended to constitute the exhibit index.

 

  3.1    Third Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on June 15, 2010.
  3.2    2009 Amended and Restated Bylaws. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2009 (the “May 19 8-K”).
  4.1    Rights Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2009, between Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and Mellon Investor Services. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the May 19 8-K.
31.1    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

30


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Dated: February 10, 2011   ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
  By  

/s/ Nicholas Konidaris

  Nicholas Konidaris
  President and Chief Executive Officer
  (Principal Executive Officer)
  By  

/s/ Paul Oldham

  Paul Oldham
  Vice President of Administration,
  Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
  (Principal Financial Officer)
  By  

/s/ Kerry Mustoe

  Kerry Mustoe
  Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
  (Principal Accounting Officer)

 

31

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas Konidaris, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 10, 2011

 

/s/ Nicholas Konidaris

Nicholas Konidaris
President and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Oldham, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 10, 2011

 

/s/ Paul Oldham

Paul Oldham
Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended January 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nicholas Konidaris, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Nicholas Konidaris

Nicholas Konidaris
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: February 10, 2011

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended January 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Oldham, Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Paul Oldham

Paul Oldham
Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

Dated: February 10, 2011

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.